ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Circular mRNA against CleanCap linear mRNA vectors: comprehensive comparison, expression, active and passive immunization.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The mRNA platform has revolutionised vaccine technology by offering a universal, rapid, and easily scalable production process. Two main types of mRNA vectors exist-linear (cap‑dependent) and circular (cap‑independent)-each with distinct advantages. Although both vector types are continuously being improved, a comprehensive comparative analysis of the most efficient existing vectors of each type has been lacking. Methods: We compared the expression efficiency, protective activity, and therapeutic activity of circular and linear mRNA vectors. Linear vectors were tested in different configurations: containing either N1‑methylpseudouridine or uridine, and capped with either ARCA (m Results: Preliminary luciferase assays showed that modified linear vectors achieved significantly higher expression levels both Discussion: Despite the markedly higher expression levels observed with modified linear vectors both in vitro and in vivo we didn`t observe the superiority in immunogenicity or protection in active immunization experiment. At the same time for passive immunization, requiring high expression levels of target protein linear vectors seems to be better choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.