ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Biopsy with same-session MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy versus biopsy alone in patients with primary unresectable glioblastoma: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05318612 (), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
(Cost)Effectiveness of MR-guided LITT Therapy in Patients With Primary Irresectable Glioblastoma: a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (EMITT)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy as Surgical Approach for Unresectable Glioblastoma: Hope is on the Horizon?The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive malignancy with poor outcomes, particularly when resection is infeasible. Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) offers a minimally invasive cytoreductive option, though robust evidence remains limited. The aim of the EMITT trial (NCT05318612) was to evaluate LITT in these patients. However, the study was terminated early following funding retraction due to slow patient inclusion. Despite being underpowered, its findings provide valuable insights into LITT's potential role. Methods: In this non-blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial, adult patients with unresectable GBM were randomised 1:1 to biopsy or biopsy with same-session LITT followed by standard of care. Patients were recruited by seven Dutch neurosurgical hospitals. Primary outcomes were overall survival and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) at 5 months post-randomization. Minimum follow-up was 18 months or until death. Findings: Patients were included between April 19, 2022, and March 19, 2024. Twenty-nine patients were included; three were excluded post-randomization, leaving twenty-six for intention-to-treat analyses: fourteen in the control group and twelve in the intervention group. Median survival was 4.8 months (95%CI 3.4-not estimable) in controls and 7.8 months (95%CI 2.58-not estimable) in intervention. Mean QLQ-C30 summary scores at 5 months were 77 (SD 11) and 81 (SD 11). Interpretation: Definitive conclusions regarding (cost-)effectiveness are precluded by small sample size and baseline imbalances. This work highlights the need for larger prospective studies to establish LITT's effectiveness in this population and lessons learned may inform the design of future trials. Funding: Funding by the Dutch Healthcare Institute and ZonMw.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.