SynthesisPsychological medicine2026
Risk factors associated with blood dyscrasia during clozapine treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clozapine is the only effective treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but concerns over blood dyscrasia and need for monitoring limit its use. Evidence suggests many hematological abnormalities may result from surveillance bias, with agranulocytosis being the primary adverse effect directly induced by clozapine. This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42024487199) investigates non-genetic risk factors associated with blood dyscrasia during clozapine treatment, focusing on neutropenia and agranulocytosis. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed on studies reporting quantitative risk data. Due to inconsistent neutropenia definitions, analyses used absolute neutrophil count (ANC) thresholds of <2000/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.