Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42112933›Full record

ReviewEssays in biochemistry2026

Bacterial weaponry and the ecological factors of competitive success.

Mia Gee, Connor Sharp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mia GeeSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.ORCID 0009-0004-8616-6446
Connor SharpSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-9424-3622

Funding

University of Reading (UoR) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria have evolved complex protein systems known as bacterial weapons to inhibit or kill their competitors. These bacterial weapons are a remarkably diverse arsenal that influence the composition and function of important microbial communities such as the human microbiome. In turn, the spatial constraints, nutrient availability, environmental stressors, and the presence of competitors determine not only whether weapons are expressed, but which weapons provide the greatest advantage. While bacterial weaponry is widespread, the types, mechanisms, and abundance of these systems vary between, and even within, species. Recent research has highlighted the importance of bacterial weaponry in community invasion and pathogenicity. Their potency and narrow killing spectrum have also generated interest in exploiting bacterial weapons to engineer microbial communities or develop therapeutics that avoid the disruption of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Understanding how ecological context affects weapon efficacy could reveal new virulence mechanisms used by pathogens and inform the design of novel treatments and microbiome-based therapies. This review outlines three of the best-studied bacterial weapon systems (protein bacteriocins, the type VI secretion system, and contact-dependent inhibition), highlighting their roles in microbial ecology, pathogenicity and their potential as therapeutics.

Indexed as

BacteriaAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBacteriocinsHumansMicrobiotaType VI Secretion SystemsBacterial ProteinsBacteriocinsType VI Secretion SystemsBacteriaBacterial warfareMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID42112933
PMCPMC13538137

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.