ArticleBioMed research international2026
In Vitro Antidiabetic Activity and Mechanism of Action of Methanolic Extract of Opuntia stricta Cladodes.
Article in BioMed research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction, leading to chronic hyperglycemia. Although Opuntia species have demonstrated antidiabetic potential, evidence on the in vitro mechanisms of Opuntia stricta cladodes (OSCs) remains limited. This study investigated the antidiabetic activity and mechanism of action of methanolic extracts of OSC using multiple cell-based assays.
methodsCladodes were collected in Zambia, shade-dried, powdered, and extracted with methanol. Cytotoxicity and antidiabetic effects were assessed using C3A hepatocytes, L6 myoblasts, Caco-2 epithelial cells, and INS-1 β-cells. Assays included cell viability, glucose utilization, glucose uptake, and β-cell proliferation. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test (p < 0.05).
resultsThe OSC extract showed good tolerability, with cell viability > 80% across all cell lines. In C3A hepatocytes, glucose utilization increased significantly at 6.25-100 μg/mL (p < 0.001), with the highest effect at 100 μg/mL (90.1% ± 0.3%) compared to untreated (86.3% ± 0.4%). Glucose uptake was also significantly enhanced at 100 μg/mL compared to untreated (51.2% ± 1.0% vs. 43.4% ± 2.5%, p < 0.001) but without a significant difference from insulin (50.2% ± 3.6%, p = 0.984). After 24 h in L6 myoblasts, treatment at 100 μg/mL modestly but significantly increased glucose utilization compared with untreated controls (95.06% ± 0.44% vs. 93.5% ± 0.59%, p < 0.005). Uptake also increased significantly at 100 μg/mL when compared to untreated (53.7% ± 1.7% vs. 48.5% ± 2.6%, p < 0.005) but was not significantly different from insulin (53.7% ± 1.7% vs. 54.3% ± 2.0%, p = 0.999). In Caco-2 cells, glucose uptake decreased compared with untreated controls at 6.25 μg/mL (57.5% ± 4.9% vs. 64.6% ± 3.6%, p < 0.05) and 100 μg/mL (50.8% ± 9.4% vs. 64.6% ± 3.6%, p < 0.001). In INS-1 β-cells, proliferation increased at 125 μg/mL after 24 h compared to untreated (111.8% ± 2.2% vs. 100.0% ± 3.8%, p < 0.001), exceeding 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (97.8% ± 4.1%) but declined significantly at 48 and 72 h (p < 0.05).
conclusionOSC extracts enhanced glucose utilization and uptake in C3A hepatocytes and L6 myoblasts to levels similar to insulin, reduced intestinal glucose uptake in Caco-2 cells relative to untreated controls, and transiently stimulated β-cell proliferation beyond that of 10% FBS. These findings highlight OSC as a promising source of antidiabetic bioactives, warranting further molecular and in vivo studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.