ArticlePhysical therapy2026
The value of integrating physical therapists into primary care, including patient outcomes and health care costs: a scoping review.
Article in Physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePhysical therapists have served in primary care roles in the United States military, but the model has yet to be widely adopted in US private, non-governmental health care settings. This review aims to map existing literature regarding the implementation and variations of primary care physical therapy (PCPT) models, assessing health care utilization and patient outcomes. DATA SOURCES, STUDY SELECTION, DATA EXTRACTION, AND SYNTHESIS: We searched 3 electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus) for studies published from 2014 to 2023 in English language. Studies that evaluated health care utilization/costs or patient outcomes while comparing PCPT with the traditional medical primary care model were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Main outcomes included study characteristics (population, setting, and model of PCPT), and reported outcomes relevant to health care utilization/costs and patient outcomes.
resultsOf the 3565 publications identified, 39 were included in the scoping review. Seventeen studies contained sufficient detail to describe the integration of physical therapists into primary care, and included approaches such as team-based care, co-location of physical therapists in a primary care clinic, and the use of a formalized triage system at the primary care clinic that directed patients to schedule with a physical therapist first. PCPT models have been described in multiple countries internationally. In the United States, PCPT is largely described in unique payor systems including the military, Veterans Affairs, and employee health settings. PCPT may be associated with lower health care costs and utilization compared to traditional medical primary care, particularly in terms of reduced imaging (17 out of 19 studies) and medication use (11 out of 17 studies), including opioid use (5 out of 5 studies). Patient outcomes appeared similar between PCPT and medical primary care pathway, but less robust evidence is available on the topic. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This scoping review found a variety of PCPT models used in governmental, including military, and civilian settings in the United States and internationally, with evidence suggesting that integrating physical therapists in primary care may result in reduced health care utilization with non-inferior patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.