ArticlePloS one2026
Multi-Omics and network-based exploration of potential molecular pathways in heart failure relevant to left bundle branch pacing response heterogeneity: Immune remodeling, hub gene identification, and drug repurposing hypotheses.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has gained increasing attention as a novel pacing strategy, but its molecular underpinnings in the context of heart failure (HF) remain unclear due to limited LBBP-specific datasets.We integrated three GEO datasets (GSE5406, GSE19303, GSE21610) representing HF transcriptomics and performed batch correction, differential expression analysis, functional enrichment, immune infiltration profiling, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), hub gene identification, and drug-pathway prediction.PCA demonstrated successful batch correction across datasets. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including HOPX, NPPA, MYH6, SERPINA3, and ASPN, were identified. Enrichment analyses indicated extracellular matrix remodeling, cardiac development, and cGMP-PKG signaling. Immune analysis showed significant alterations in B cell memory, plasma cells, CD8 T cells, regulatory T cells, NK cells, monocytes, macrophages (M0/M1/M2), dendritic cells, and mast cells. WGCNA highlighted significant modules (MEpink, MElightyellow, MEyellow, MEgreenyellow) associated with treatment response. Hub gene analysis confirmed ASPN, HOPX, MYH6, SERPINA3, and NPPA as key drivers. Drug prediction suggested multiple candidates, including β-blockers, RAAS inhibitors, anti-fibrotic agents, vericiguat, metformin, and SGLT2 inhibitors.This integrative analysis of HF transcriptomics reveals potential immune remodeling, hub genes, and repurposable drugs relevant to LBBP response heterogeneity, providing hypothesis-generating insights and potential therapeutic strategies for validation in LBBP-specific cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.