ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessment of road accident risk in India under a type-2 picture fuzzy framework with novel distance measures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of road accidents in India by using official government data sets from 53 major cities across 28 states. This research is conducted under a Type-2 picture fuzzy environment with advanced aggregation operators such as the arithmetic mean, geometric mean, hamy mean, Einstein weighted operator, and Aczel-Alsina operator. To enhance decision-making under uncertainty, a novel distance measure is proposed and theoretically validated. Five prominent distance-based multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods such as TOPSIS, VIKOR, WASPAS, CODAS, and COPRAS were applied to rank the cities based on 35 critical road accident-related criteria. The results of the model revealed that Chennai consistently secured the top ranking in TOPSIS, COPRAS, and FIR. Amritsar also performed exceptionally, ranking 1st in VIKOR and achieving 3rd in TOPSIS. In contrast, cities such as Kanpur, Lucknow, and Ahmedabad consistently ranked in the bottom quartile, with Kanpur receiving the lowest position (53rd) in TOPSIS and FIR, indicating they are in critical risk zones. Mid-ranked cities such as Hyderabad, Pune, and Rajkot showed variations across methods but maintained stable FIR positions. To validate the robustness of the rankings, a comprehensive sensitivity analysis was conducted by various decision parameter q, confirming the stability of rankings under fluctuating conditions. The proposed framework improved the precision of accident severity and demonstrated adaptability to broader decision-making scenarios involving uncertainty. This study contributes a novel, integrated, and mathematically rigorous methodology for assessing urban safety for policymakers to reduce the road accident risks across Indian cities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.