ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Protective effect of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) against prenatal cytarabine exposure-induced developmental toxicity in SD rat.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytarabine (CTB), an antimetabolite anticancer drug, serves as cornerstone therapy for several blood cancers. Despite its exemplary efficacy, its use is associated with several toxic effects including developmental toxicity. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a dietary omega-3 fatty acid, has demonstrated pleiotropic protective effects against various toxicities and is associated with improved pregnancy and neonatal outcomes and evidence suggests that DHA does not compromise, and may even enhance, the therapeutic effects of CTB. This study aimed to evaluate the protective effect of DHA against CTB-induced developmental toxicity in rat fetuses. Dams were divided into five groups and received the vehicle, DHA 200 mg/kg, CTB 12.5 mg/kg, CTB 25 mg/kg, and CTB 25 mg/kg plus DHA 200 mg/kg, respectively, from gestational day (GD)8 to GD14. The food intake and body weight of the dams were recorded daily. On GD15 blood samples were collected for hormonal assessment, and dams were sacrificed on GD21. CTB exposure during gestation resulted in a notable reduction in food intake, body weight gain, placental weight, estrogen, and progesterone levels, and elevation in oxidative stress markers in the placenta in dams. Prenatal CTB exposure led to fetal resorptions, fetal mortality, growth retardation, oxidative stress, and external developmental anomalies such as hematoma, phocomelia, oligodactyly, and impaired ossification in fetal axial and appendicular skeletal bones. Co-administration of DHA resulted in amelioration of the footprints of CTB-induced toxicity in pregnant rats as well as the fetus. These findings indicate that DHA has therapeutic potential against CTB-induced developmental toxicity. However, future experimental and clinical studies are warranted to explore the possible mechanisms involved in the protection offered by maternal supplementation of DHA against CTB-induced developmental toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42115397What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.