ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
The global landscape of robot-assisted pedicle screws: a bibliometric and thematic evolution analysis.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement has become an increasingly visible area of spinal surgery research because of its potential to improve instrumentation accuracy, procedural safety, and operative planning. As robotic platforms have expanded, the corresponding literature has also grown, creating the need for a focused evaluation of how this field has developed. The objective of this study was to analyze the global research landscape, bibliometric characteristics, thematic evolution, and major contributors in the scientific literature on robot-assisted pedicle screw placement. We conducted a descriptive bibliometric study using records retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus databases. Data were analyzed with the Bibliometrix package in R to evaluate publication trends, prolific authors, highly cited articles, journals, countries, institutional affiliations, collaboration networks, and keyword co-occurrence. Scientific output increased markedly from the late 2010s through 2025, with China and the United States accounting for most publications and much of the international collaboration. The most influential articles focused mainly on the accuracy and safety of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement relative to conventional techniques. This bibliometric and thematic analysis clarifies how research in this field has been structured and where it has concentrated over time, helping to identify current priorities and underexplored directions for future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42115537What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.