ArticleScientific reports2026
Endolysosomal trafficking regulator SH-BC-893 inhibits coronavirus entry in vitro and in vivo.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection may not protect from future novel coronavirus outbreaks. Although several drugs targeting essential coronavirus proteins are broadly effective, the error-prone coronavirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and a rapid viral replication cycle mean that drug resistance will likely emerge. Small molecules that target sequence-stable host proteins could offer more durable pan-coronavirus activity. Here, we show that the well-tolerated and orally bioavailable small molecule SH-BC-893 protects from endosomal, but not plasma membrane, entry by diverse coronavirus strains. SH-BC-893 alters endolysosomal trafficking similar to PIKfyve inhibitors and, like hydroxychloroquine, reduces cathepsin L activity. While all three compounds block endosomal entry mediated by coronavirus spike proteins in vitro, PIKfyve inhibitors and chloroquine derivatives are ineffective or even increase viral titer in vivo. In contrast, SH-BC-893 reduced viral titer in the lungs of mice infected intranasally with the LD50 of the MHV-1 coronavirus by 3 logs. Thus, poor in vivo outcomes when using apilimod or chloroquine as anti-virals likely reflect pharmacologic limitations of these compounds rather than a flawed therapeutic strategy. We anticipate that SH-BC-893 or optimized analogs with similar tissue pharmacology could control infections by novel coronaviruses, particularly if given in combination with TMPRSS2 inhibitors to block entry at the plasma membrane, an obvious escape pathway. Because it targets host rather than viral proteins, SH-BC-893 might also block infection by many other viruses that enter via endosomal pathways: orthomyxoviruses (influenza), filoviruses (Ebola, Marburg), flaviviruses (Dengue, Zika, and West Nile), alphaviruses (Chikungunya) rhabdoviruses (rabies), and bunyaviruses (Hantaan or Sin Nombre). In sum, further evaluation of SH-BC-893 and/or optimized analogs as potential pan-antiviral agents is merited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.