ArticleScientific reports2026
A novel intelligent hybrid reinforcement learning framework for autonomous decision making in complex health cognitive systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Surgical Robotics: A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Digital and Remote Interventions for Musculoskeletal Aging: Real-Time Muscle Strain Severity Detection Using Artificial Intelligence.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Article
- HybridCATNet: an explainable CNN-Transformer framework with early multi-channel fusion and uncertainty estimation for pneumonia detection from chest X-rays.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing reinforcement learning (RL) approaches struggle to balance real-time decision-making with adaptive learning in dynamic healthcare environments. We propose a brain-inspired hybrid RL framework that integrates model-based (MB) planning and model-free (MF) reflexes via a dynamic meta-controller, neuro-symbolic clinical knowledge, counterfactual reasoning, and ethical safeguards. The framework is validated on a multimodal cerebral palsy (CP) dataset (86 patients) using NetLogo multi-agent simulations and Weka classifiers. A combined reward mechanism achieves 99% total reward accumulation, with 98% optimal reward in 95% of training episodes. Component analysis shows a 60% MB / 40% MF contribution, yielding a 15% improvement over standalone methods. Optimal weighting (0.7 MB, 0.3 MF) further enhances performance. External zero-shot validation on three public datasets (NTNU-HARChildren, EEG-EMG exoskeleton, D4RL) confirms generalizability (macro F1 84.3%, accuracy 81.7%, D4RL scores 68.5 and 62.3). Regression methods achieve correlation coefficients up to 0.94, and classification models (multinomial Naïve Bayes, logistic regression) attain 100% precision, recall, and F-measure. The framework provides a reliable, explainable, and simulation-validated solution for patient-centric autonomous decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.