ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2026
Evolutionary genetics of ageing.
Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern humans now routinely survive to advanced ages, in far greater proportions than ancestral populations, and thus experience the consequences of molecular pathways optimized for youth yet still active in old age. Natural selection weakens over the course of adulthood, creating a selection 'shadow' in which deleterious late-acting mutations accumulate and alleles with early-life benefits persist despite late-life costs. An evolutionary lens helps us to understand puzzling patterns - from conserved longevity pathways spanning the tree of life to a 100-fold variation in maximum lifespan across vertebrates - and explains why age-related diseases share genetic architectures. Advances in comparative genomics, large-scale human genetic studies and multi-omics ageing biomarkers now enable rigorous testing of evolutionary predictions. This Review integrates evolutionary genetics with molecular mechanisms to clarify why ageing evolves, how it varies across species and individuals, and how these insights can guide healthspan extension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42115756What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.