Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115872›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2026

Comparative evaluation of Sm1-7-qPCR systems incorporated with Maxwell kit-based and NaOH-based DNA extraction methods for the detection of Schistosoma mansoni infection.

Yi Mu, Thomas G Egwang, Candia Rowel, Moses Adriko, Malcolm K Jones, Helena Ullyartha Pangaribuan, Toni Wandra, Donald P McManus, Pengfei Cai

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yi MuMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Australia.
Thomas G EgwangDepartment of Immunology and Parasitology, Med Biotech Laboratories, Kampala, Uganda.
Candia RowelVector Borne & Neglected Tropical Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Moses AdrikoVector Borne & Neglected Tropical Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Malcolm K JonesMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Australia.
Helena Ullyartha PangaribuanCenter for Biomedical Research, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Research Organization for Health, Bogor, Indonesia.
Toni WandraDirectorate of Postgraduate, Sari Mutiara Indonesia University, Medan, Indonesia.
Donald P McManusMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Australia.
Pengfei CaiMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Australia. Pengfei.Cai@qimrb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization's latest roadmap for neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) 2021-2030 has highlighted diagnostics as one of four focus areas to achieve the targets set for 2030. Molecular diagnostic tests, such as quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), are valuable for diagnosing NTDs, including schistosomiasis. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate two Sm1-7-qPCR systems incorporating different DNA extraction approaches for the detection of Schistosoma mansoni infection.

methodsTwo copro-DNA-qPCR systems were developed: a Maxwell kit-based copro-DNA-Sm1-7-qPCR system (Sm1-7-qPCR-S1) and a NaOH-based copro-DNA-Sm1-7-qPCR system (Sm1-7-qPCR-S2). Both systems were tested on faecal samples collected from schistosomiasis endemic and non-endemic areas in Uganda (n = 482). A composite reference based on positive results of either the Kato-Katz (KK) or qPCR assays was used for calibration. The S. mansoni positivity rates were analyzed based on the results of different diagnostics. Differences in DNA concentration and cycle threshold (Ct) values from the two copro-DNA-qPCR systems were compared (Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

resultsThe overall S. mansoni positivity rate was 52.9% (229/433) according to the composite reference, whereas the KK, Sm1-7-qPCR-S1 and Sm1-7-qPCR-S2 recorded positivity rates of 36.7% (159/433), 43.9% (190/433), and 47.6% (206/433), respectively. Sm1-7-qPCR-S2 demonstrated a sensitivity of 90.0%, outperforming the KK and Sm1-7-qPCR-S1 with sensitivities of 69.4% and 83.0%, respectively (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.015, respectively, χ

conclusionsThis study highlights that DNA samples extracted from both systems are suitable for robust qPCR amplification. The Sm1-7-qPCR-S2 system offers several advantages over the Sm1-7-qPCR-S1 system, including improved sensitivity, field accessibility, and lower cost. With further refinement, the Sm1-7-qPCR-S2 system could be integrated into the existing schistosomiasis surveillance network to aid the elimination of the disease.

Indexed as

DNA, HelminthMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasis mansoniAnimalsFecesHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySodium HydroxideUgandaDNA, HelminthSodium HydroxideMolecular diagnosisNaOH-based DNA extractionReal-time PCRSchistosoma mansoniSm1-7-qPCRUganda

Identifiers

PMID42115872
PMCPMC13159289

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.