Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42117346›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026

A Comparison of the Gut Microbiome of Two Sympatric Macropods Along an Urbanisation Gradient in Tasmania.

Hanh K D Nguyen, Penelope J Jones, Dave Kendal, Shane M Powell, Kelsie Raspin, Jo Dickinson, Emily J Flies

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hanh K D NguyenSchool of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, Geography Building, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, TAS, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6575-6031
Penelope J JonesHealthy Landscapes Research Group, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, TAS, Australia.
Dave KendalHealthy Landscapes Research Group, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, TAS, Australia.
Shane M PowellTasmanian Institute of Agriculture (TIA), Life Sciences Building, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, TAS, Australia.
Kelsie RaspinMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Jo DickinsonMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Emily J FliesSchool of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, Geography Building, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, TAS, Australia.

Funding

Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the gut flora of the red-necked wallaby (Notamacropus rufogriseus rufogriseus) and the Tasmanian pademelon (Thylogale billardierii) in the small city of Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Faecal samples were collected from greenspaces across the Greater Hobart region. These greenspaces were chosen in areas with different human population densities. DNA was extracted from these samples, and targeted sequencing of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene was performed to understand the bacterial community. Our results showed that despite the many shared ecological traits between the two species, their gut microbiome displayed different responses to urban living. Alpha and beta diversity were significantly different across the urban gradient for Bennett's wallaby, but not for Tasmanian pademelon. Relative composition for both species was different across the urbanisation gradient. Some bacterial taxa associated with nutrient processing showed the clearest changes. The conclusion of this research is that living in cities can affect the gut microbiome of these two marsupial herbivores. More studies are needed to determine whether this has implications for the health of these species.

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMacropodidaeAnimalsCitiesDNA, BacterialFecesParks, RecreationalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSympatryTasmaniaUrbanizationDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID42117346
PMCPMC13162132

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.