Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118789›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2026

Comparing Phenotypic Susceptibility Profiles of Neisseria gonorrhoeae for Tetracycline and Doxycycline.

Lu Liu, John A Branda, Francesca Azzato, Jeffrey D Klausner, Ellen N Kersh, Shivani Pasricha, Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lu LiuFrom the Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
John A BrandaDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Francesca AzzatoFrom the Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jeffrey D KlausnerDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Ellen N KershGeorgia Public Health Laboratory, Georgia Department of Public Health, Decatur, GA.
Shivani PasrichaFrom the Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lao-Tzu Allan-BlitzDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among 64 Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates, the MIC50 of tetracycline was 1 µg/mL while the MIC90 was 16 µg/mL. The MIC50 of doxycycline was 1 µg/mL while the MIC90 was 8 µg/mL. The essential agreement between doxycycline and tetracycline was 92.2% (95% confidence interval 82.7%-97.4%).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclineGonorrheaNeisseria gonorrhoeaeTetracyclineDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhenotypeAnti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclineTetracycline

Identifiers

PMID42118789
PMCPMC13229205

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.