ArticleCommunications biology2026
Induced DNA double strand breaks by genotoxic drugs occur at active transcription H3K36 tri-methylation sites.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The key to arsenic pollution remediation: engineering and functional effects of arsenic-resistant microorganisms.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many anti-cancer clastogens are known to induce DNA replication stress and ultimately DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), one of the most deleterious forms of DNA damage and threat to genome integrity. However, the mechanism(s) by which these chemicals cause DSB is unclear. Our previous work suggested that they induce DSB at transcriptionally up-regulated genes, particularly those oriented in a head-on configuration with respect to incoming replication. Here, we rigorously test this model by simultaneously mapping the transcriptome and genome-wide DSBs induced by six replication stress induders with diverse mechanisms of action (hydroxyurea, methyl-methane sulfonate, camptothecin, actinomycin, doxorubicin and methotrexate). Our data show that replication stress-induced DSBs are enriched in genic regions and show a positive correlation with active transcription histone marks, particularly histone H3 lysine 36 tri-methylation. We further demonstrated that camptothecin-induced DSBs were significantly reduced by deletion of Set2, the known H3K36 methyltransferase, and to a lesser extent, by deletion of Rpd3, a histone deacetylase recognizing H3K36 trimethylation. Our data provide support for a model where DSBs are driven by replication inhibitor-induced replication-transcription conflict. More importantly, they reveal active transcription histone markers as the impediments for replication fork progression, therefore a direct culprit for DSBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.