ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Structural imaging predictors of ketamine response in treatment-resistant depression: a machine learning approach.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ketamine has demonstrated rapid antidepressant efficacy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but clinical decision-making is challenging due to variability in individual response. Current trial-and-error prescribing practices may expose patients to ineffective treatment and avoidable adverse effects, underscoring the need for reliable predictive tools to optimize treatment selection and support personalized, evidence-based care. We developed a machine-learning model (support vector classifier) to predict antidepressant response to ketamine using pre-treatment structural MRI data. The model was trained on 99 adults with TRD given a single intravenous ketamine infusion (0.5 mg/kg). Clinical response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in MADRS scores 24 h post-infusion. Internal validation used repeated nested cross-validation, and generalizability was tested in two independent ketamine-treated cohorts (n = 51) and a saline-treated control group (n = 49). Among ketamine-treated participants, 52 (52.5%) responded to treatment. The model achieved a balanced accuracy of 72.2% (sensitivity = 72.3%, specificity = 73.1%, AUC = 0.72) in the discovery sample and 60.0% (p = 0.01, AUC = 0.65) in external validation. Greater gray matter volume in frontal regions predicted response, whereas greater cerebellar volume predicted non-response. Performance dropped to chance in the saline cohort (BAC = 41.1%, AUC = 0.45), supporting pharmacologic specificity. These findings present the first machine-learning model for the prediction of ketamine response in TRD using structural neuroimaging and highlight its potential utility for stratified treatment planning and biomarker-informed interventions while providing mechanistic insight into neuroanatomical predictors of antidepressant response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.