ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026
A comparative analysis in a clinical cohort: multiple imputation by chained equations and a novel super learner-based imputation approach.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMissing data is a challenge in clinical research, especially in real-world data (RWD), where complete case analysis can bias results and reduce power. Ensemble learning approaches like Super Learner (SL) show strong numerical performance for prediction problems, but their use for missing value imputation (MVI) in oncology datasets is unexplored. We sought to develop and evaluate a novel SL-based imputation function that can impute multiple variables and quantify observation-specific uncertainty.
methodsWe analyzed two independent cohorts of acute myeloid leukemia patients (n = 1641), 546 patients from the University of Colorado and 1095 from an external real-world cohort. The SL-based MVI function includes data processing, predictor selection, binary and continuous variable pipelines, and automatic performance measurement. Ensembles for both binary and continuous variables integrate diverse base learners, such as generalized linear models, random forests, and neural networks, via a meta learner that optimizes predictive accuracy. The binary variable pipeline's SL ensemble was optimized using area under the curve (AUC), while the continuous variable pipeline's SL ensemble was optimized via non-negative least squares. Performance was compared to multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) using balanced accuracy, F
resultsIn a numerical experiment with 9 clinically important binary features, the proposed MVI function imputed and achieved higher balanced accuracy than MICE for 7/9 variables (mean balanced accuracy 89.04% vs. 80.75%) with comparable performance for the other 2 variables. The continuous variable SL ensemble, across 4 variables, showed an average 24.45% lower RMSE than MICE. On average, the SL ensemble trained for prediction took 145.02 s to process for binary targets.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the SL-based imputation function has improved performance over MICE in high-dimensional RWD while providing novel, observation-level uncertainty quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.