Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122250›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Artificial Intelligence Tools in Precision Lung Cancer Care: From Early Detection to Clinical Decision Support.

Christopher R Grant, Sandip P Patel, Tali Azenkot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher R GrantSan Diego Moores Cancer Center, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Sandip P PatelSan Diego Moores Cancer Center, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Tali AzenkotSan Diego Moores Cancer Center, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3329-6381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thoracic malignancies are uniquely positioned for the integration of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), which have the potential to advance precision oncology across the cancer care continuum. In cancer screening, AI has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and scalability. Deep learning applied to pathology (pathomics) and imaging (radiomics) has enabled the development of novel, noninvasive tools capable of predicting histologic and molecular features that may correlate with treatment response or toxicity. In drug discovery, computational approaches can analyze large-scale genomic, chemical, and clinical datasets to accelerate target identification and match candidate compounds to available targets; this may be particularly useful in the context of resistance to targeted therapy. AI tools may also support treatment planning for radiation and surgery, guide systemic therapy selection, and facilitate continuous monitoring for early identification of treatment resistance or toxicity. As these technologies are integrated into clinical workflows, careful attention to ethical, regulatory, and clinical governance frameworks will be essential to ensure equitable implementation and bias mitigation. Maintaining human oversight and a human-centered approach remain critical, as complex treatment decisions and sensitive patient interactions are central to the care of patients with thoracic malignancies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learninglung cancermachine learningprecision medicinethoracic oncology

Identifiers

PMID42122250
PMCPMC13162829

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.