ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: A Review of Perception, Decision, and Execution Systems.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an indispensable tool in orthopedic surgery. It provides new methods to increase surgical precision, improve patient safety, and support personalized treatment plans. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of AI-assisted orthopedic surgery across three core domains. Based on 89 recent studies, this review organizes findings around a perception-decision-execution framework. It groups diverse AI applications into certain categories while highlighting the mutuality across domains. Perception systems have progressed from basic CNN-based segmentation models to advanced transformer architectures. They support multi-modal data fusion and enable uncertainty quantification. Decision systems have moved far beyond rigid rule-based methods and evolve into data-driven models that support surgical planning, accurate risk prediction and continuous outcome optimization. And execution systems have advanced from passive navigation tools to active robotic assistance systems with real-time adaptive capabilities. Beyond mapping technological advances, this review also identifies pivotal challenges that hinder clinical translation and concludes with a clear roadmap for future research, which marks closed-loop surgical assistance systems as the next key development direction. Building on these findings, this review illuminates the potential of AI-assisted orthopedic surgery and guides future research toward innovations that can be translated into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.