ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Functional Nanomaterials and Nanocomposites for High-Performance Printed Biosensors.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Printed biosensors have attracted increasing attention as platforms for rapid, low-cost, and portable diagnostics because they can be fabricated on flexible or rigid substrates using scalable printing techniques. Their performance is strongly influenced by both the printing process and the materials employed, since factors such as ink rheology, particle dispersion, interfacial behavior, and post-processing conditions directly affect device architecture, sensing performance, and manufacturing reliability. This review summarizes recent advances in printed biosensors from the combined perspectives of printing technologies and functional materials. Commonly employed printing techniques, including inkjet, screen, aerosol jet, and roll-to-roll gravure printing, are discussed with emphasis on their processing characteristics and material requirements. The review also examines key material platforms used in printed biosensors, including carbon-based nanomaterials, metal oxides, metal nanoparticles, conductive polymers, dielectric materials, and hybrid composites, highlighting their roles in electrical conductivity, catalytic activity, biomolecule immobilization, mechanical flexibility, and overall analytical performance. Finally, current challenges and emerging research directions are outlined with respect to ink stability, post-processing strategies, sensor reliability, manufacturability, and practical translation. Overall, this review emphasizes that the development of high-performance printed biosensors depends on the synergistic integration of rational material design with optimized printing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.