Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122797›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Towards Robust UAV Navigation in Agriculture: Key Technologies, Application, and Future Directions.

Guantong Dong, Xiuhua Lou, Haihua Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guantong DongCollege of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Qinghua East Road No. 17, Haidian, Beijing 100083, China.
Xiuhua LouCollege of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Qinghua East Road No. 17, Haidian, Beijing 100083, China.
Haihua WangCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, 17 Qinghua East Road, Haidian, Beijing 100083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are becoming an important platform for precision agriculture, supporting both high-throughput sensing and active field operations such as spraying, monitoring, and phenotyping. However, unlike general UAV applications, agricultural environments impose distinctive challenges due to heterogeneous field structures, canopy occlusion, terrain variation, dynamic disturbances, and strong coupling between navigation performance and task quality. To address this gap, this review presents a systematic analysis of UAV navigation in agricultural environments from a system-level perspective. The review first summarizes the core technical components of agricultural UAV navigation, including sensing, localization, mapping, planning, and control. It then discusses how navigation requirements vary across representative scenarios such as open fields, orchards, and terraced farmland, and examines their roles in key applications including aerial mapping, field monitoring, precision spraying, and close-range orchard operations. In addition, datasets, simulation platforms, and evaluation protocols relevant to agricultural UAV navigation are reviewed. Finally, major challenges are identified, including scene heterogeneity, perception degradation, insufficient task-semantic integration, limited control robustness, and the lack of standardized benchmarks. Future research should move toward robust, task-aware, and modular navigation architectures that support reliable and scalable agricultural UAV deployment.

Indexed as

localization and mappingpath planningprecision agricultureprecision sprayingUAVUAV navigation

Identifiers

PMID42122797
PMCPMC13165239

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.