ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Towards Robust UAV Navigation in Agriculture: Key Technologies, Application, and Future Directions.
Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimation of Grain Yield and Quality in Awned and Awnless Wheat Genotypes Using UAV and Proximal Multispectral Sensors.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advanced Remote Sensing and AI Techniques in Agriculture and Forestry.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimization of UAV Spraying in Mountainous Nanguo Pear Orchards: Effects of Canopy Size and Operational Parameters on Droplet Deposition and Penetration.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are becoming an important platform for precision agriculture, supporting both high-throughput sensing and active field operations such as spraying, monitoring, and phenotyping. However, unlike general UAV applications, agricultural environments impose distinctive challenges due to heterogeneous field structures, canopy occlusion, terrain variation, dynamic disturbances, and strong coupling between navigation performance and task quality. To address this gap, this review presents a systematic analysis of UAV navigation in agricultural environments from a system-level perspective. The review first summarizes the core technical components of agricultural UAV navigation, including sensing, localization, mapping, planning, and control. It then discusses how navigation requirements vary across representative scenarios such as open fields, orchards, and terraced farmland, and examines their roles in key applications including aerial mapping, field monitoring, precision spraying, and close-range orchard operations. In addition, datasets, simulation platforms, and evaluation protocols relevant to agricultural UAV navigation are reviewed. Finally, major challenges are identified, including scene heterogeneity, perception degradation, insufficient task-semantic integration, limited control robustness, and the lack of standardized benchmarks. Future research should move toward robust, task-aware, and modular navigation architectures that support reliable and scalable agricultural UAV deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.