Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42123213›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate SEP-1 Measure Compliance and Fluid Management in Sepsis.

H Bryant Nguyen, Eduard Krishtopaytis, Enrique Lopez, Neeka Farnoudi, Trinity Van, Viktoriia Kharalampova, Angel Coz Yataco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

H Bryant NguyenDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Hyperbaric, and Sleep Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Eduard KrishtopaytisDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Hyperbaric, and Sleep Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Enrique LopezDepartment of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Neeka FarnoudiDepartment of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Trinity VanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Viktoriia KharalampovaDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Hyperbaric, and Sleep Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Angel Coz YatacoDivision of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis remains a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide, and adherence to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) remains modest and variable across institutions. Simultaneously, controversy persists regarding fixed-volume fluid resuscitation mandates, particularly given the increasing emphasis on individualized, physiology-guided management. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential strategy to address both operational and clinical gaps in sepsis care. This review examines the current state of SEP-1 implementation, key barriers to compliance, and ongoing debates surrounding early fluid administration. We then discuss contemporary evidence on AI-enabled tools designed to accelerate bundle processes and support personalized fluid management. Early warning systems, natural language processing-augmented models, and telemedicine-integrated platforms have demonstrated improvements in process measures such as time-to-antibiotics and bundle component completion when embedded within defined clinical workflows. Reinforcement learning, causal machine learning, and predictive models offer promise for individualized fluid strategies, although most data remain retrospective and hypothesis-generating. Successful integration will require prospective validation, clinician-in-the-loop oversight, governance frameworks, and continuous monitoring for safety, equity, and model drift. AI should augment-rather than replace-clinical judgment to improve reliability, timeliness, and personalization in sepsis management.

Indexed as

antibiotic therapyartificial intelligencebundle performancefluid resuscitationmachine learningnatural language processingneural networkSEP-1 measure compliancesepsisseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID42123213
PMCPMC13163497

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.