ReviewNutrients2026
From Growth Trajectory to Functional Decline: Age-Contextualized Nutritional Strategies for Muscle Vulnerability. A Narrative Review.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscle vulnerability occurs at both extremes of the human lifespan, although its biological significance differs substantially between developmental growth and late-life decline. During childhood and adolescence, insufficient muscle accretion reflects disruption of physiological anabolic trajectories driven by inadequate energy availability, inflammatory burden, endocrine imbalance, or disease-associated catabolism. In older adults, muscle deterioration is characterized by anabolic resistance, neuromuscular remodeling, chronic low-grade inflammation, and hormonal decline, culminating in sarcopenia and loss of functional independence. The absence of harmonized diagnostic frameworks across age groups limits direct translational extrapolation. A lifespan-informed perspective distinguishing growth-supportive from function-preserving nutritional approaches is, therefore, required. This narrative review examines how major classes of nutritional bioactive interact with molecular pathways regulating skeletal muscle homeostasis in fragile populations across the lifespan. The analysis encompasses energy adequacy, protein quantity and quality, amino acid-dependent anabolic signaling, vitamin D status, lipid-derived mediators, redox-modulating phytochemicals, and micronutrients supporting mitochondrial bioenergetics. In pediatric contexts, nutritional interventions primarily aim to restore anabolic permissiveness within a structurally intact growth environment. In aging individuals, strategies focus on mitigating anabolic resistance through optimized protein intake, correction of micronutrient insufficiencies, and integration with resistance exercise to preserve functional capacity. This narrative review emphasizes the need to distinguish mechanistic rationale from clinically validated interventions, as improvements in molecular pathways do not consistently translate into meaningful functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.