ReviewMaterials today. Bio2026
Biomaterial-based strategies for postoperative residual tumors: From margin clearance to immune control and tissue repair.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative and post-ablation residual tumors represent a major yet underrecognized source of cancer recurrence, metastasis, and therapeutic failure. Distinct from primary tumors, residual lesions are typically sparse, spatially dispersed, and embedded within dynamically evolving microenvironments shaped by wound healing, inflammation, hypoxia, and immune imbalance. These features create pronounced spatiotemporal blind spots that limit the effectiveness of conventional systemic therapies and necessitate treatment strategies capable of precise local intervention, coordinated multimodal action, and active microenvironmental reconstruction. This review examines recent advances in nanomaterial-based approaches for the management of postoperative residual tumors, encompassing intraoperative and early postoperative nanotechnologies for high-resolution margin visualization and immediate disease clearance, as well as localized and sustained delivery systems-including hydrogels, implantable scaffolds, and microenvironment-responsive nanoparticles-that overcome spatial inaccessibility and temporal mismatch through prolonged retention and controlled activation. Multifunctional nanoplatforms integrating physical ablation, chemical or metabolic intervention, immune modulation, and tissue-supportive architectures are further highlighted for their ability to induce immunogenic cell death, remodel immunosuppressive niches, and concurrently promote postoperative tissue repair and functional recovery. Key challenges limiting clinical translation, including long-term biosafety, residual tumor heterogeneity, incomplete mechanistic resolution of immune effects, and the lack of standardized evaluation frameworks, are also discussed. By framing residual tumors as a coupled problem of tumor eradication and postoperative microenvironmental reconstruction, this review provides a unified conceptual framework to guide the rational design of nanomaterials for durable control of residual disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.