ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Milnacipran continuation during pregnancy in a patient with severe post-traumatic stress disorder and psychotic depression: a case report with 3-year pediatric follow-up.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence on milnacipran exposure during pregnancy is sparse, complicating treatment decisions when maternal stability depends on this antidepressant. We report a 31-year-old primigravida with severe post-traumatic stress disorder and a severe major depressive episode with psychotic features in the context of a chronic, difficult-to-treat psychiatric course marked by self-harm, dissociation, and recurrent suicidal behavior. Milnacipran 150 mg/day led to marked clinical improvement before pregnancy. After pregnancy confirmation, treatment was changed to sertraline plus quetiapine because of limited pregnancy safety data, but depressive symptoms and suicidal behavior reemerged within 2 weeks. Milnacipran was therefore re-established after risk-benefit evaluation and shared decision-making, with renewed improvement. Moderate hyperemesis gravidarum during the second trimester led to discontinuation of milnacipran by gestational week 22. Delivery occurred at gestational week 38 via primary cesarean section. No congenital anomalies or neonatal adaptation problems were observed. At 3-year follow-up, pediatric developmental screenings remained within expected limits. This case illustrates the challenge of balancing relapse risk, prior treatment response, and treatment feasibility during pregnancy when evidence for the effective medication is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.