ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Reliability of remote self-administered Web-based digital cognitive measures and comparison to in-person neuropsychological tests: Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test, and the Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of remote self-administered cognitive assessment in an Alzheimer's disease treatment clinic.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Reliability of remote self-administered Web-based digital cognitive measures and comparison to in-person neuropsychological tests: Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test, and the Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWe describe the reliability of remote self-administered digital cognitive measures completed via the Mayo Test Drive (MTD) web-based platform.
methodsA total of 1846 participants (mean age = 70, SD = 12, range 31-101; 48% male; 96% White; 99% non-Hispanic; 97% cognitively unimpaired) with two to four complete MTD sessions at ∼7.5-month intervals were included. Test-retest reliability was assessed using single-rating, absolute-agreement, and two-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals. ICCs for in-person-administered traditional neuropsychological measures were compared to MTD for a subset of 244 participants. Analyses also compared reliability across demographic, residential, and session context subgroups.
resultsReliability was good for the MTD Composite (total ICC = 0.79 [0.77, 0.80]), and moderate-to-good for the primary outcome variables for each MTD subtest (total ICCs 0.70-0.83 for Stricker Learning Span and Symbols). The reliability of the remote self-administered MTD was similar to in-person-administered cognitive measures. DISCUSSION: MTD showed moderate-to-good reliability, supporting its use in longitudinal monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.