ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
Assessment of Home-based Newborn Care in A Rural Block of Odisha Using a Structured Framework: A Concurrent Mixed-method study.
Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence related to barriers to its implementation of home-based newborn care (HBNC) has yet to be studied widely and is scarce. We conducted this study to assess the coverage and quality of HBNC services and barriers to implementation in a rural block of Odisha. Materials and Methods: The community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural block of Khordha District of Odisha. We included mothers of neonates between 42 and 60 days of age who usually resided in the study area and had registered their pregnancy in the study area for both quantitative and qualitative components. We included Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) workers with a minimum of 1 year of work experience. We used a stratified random sampling to select two villages from all the 24 subcenters. We conducted in-depth interviews with ASHA to identify facilitators and barriers related to the HBNC program. Results: A total of 16.67% (CI 9.39%-24.01%) of infants did not receive any HBNC visits, whereas 13.33% (CI 4.71%-21.89%) of infants received six or more HBNC visits. The significant barriers to conducting HBNC visits were inadequate knowledge regarding counting respiratory rate, nonfunctioning equipment, poor training, and improper knowledge regarding using the booklet. Conclusion: This study observed low coverage and quality of HBNC services. The barriers to implementing HBNC were mostly related to training and the unavailability of logistics. There is a need for capacity building and robust monitoring mechanisms to ensure benefits from the HBNC program in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.