ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026
Real-world study of treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with HR+ breast cancer after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) combined with endocrine therapy are the standard of care for metastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (HR+ MBC). However, systemic therapy options and outcomes after progression on CDK4/6is remain poorly defined. We analyzed real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with advanced HR+ MBC who received systemic therapy following CDK4/6i progression. Methods: We identified all patients with HR+ MBC treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2024. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests compared PFS and OS across post-CDK4/6i therapies, and a multivariable Cox model assessed prognostic factors. Findings: Among 1826 patients (99% female; median follow-up, 32.4 months), the median age at metastatic diagnosis was 56 years, and most were White (72%),with 10% Black, 9% Hispanic, 6% Asian/Pacific Islander, and <1% Native American. Following progression on CDK4/6is, 43% received chemotherapy, 38% targeted therapy, 12% endocrine therapy alone, and 7% investigational agents. Nearly half (48%) had visceral progression. Median PFS on subsequent therapy was 4.73 months (95% CI, 4.40-4.96), with no significant difference by therapy type. CDK4/6i duration ≥12 months was independently associated with improved PFS (HR 0.86; p = 0.021). Interpretation: Following CDK4/6i progression, most patients received chemotherapy, but PFS did not differ significantly across post-CDK4/6i treatment types. As CDK4/6is remain frontline therapy, further studies are needed to optimize treatment sequencing and improve post-CDK4/6i outcomes. Funding: Department of Defense grant (HT9425-24-1-0991) and the National Cancer Institute MDACC Support Grant (P30 CA016672).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.