ReviewBiomedical engineering and computational biology2026
Entropy as a Tool for Quantifying Biomedical Signals: Gaps and Opportunities in Clinical Methodological Approaches-A Scoping Review.
Review in Biomedical engineering and computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In biomedical and engineering research, entropy metrics have become well-established tools for assessing the complexity of dynamic and physiological systems. This scoping review examines the relationship between information theory quantifiers (ITQs), bioelectrical signals, and time series, and the limited diagnostic value of these measures in functional dyspepsia (FD). Three main variables were defined in this study: entropy, health experiments, and FD. Eighty-five academic documents were analyzed using the PRISMA methodology, following 4 phases: (i) heuristic; (ii) classification and systematic review; (iii) hermeneutic analysis; and (iv) presentation of results. ITQs are currently applied in the study of neurodegenerative diseases, cardiological conditions, and, to a lesser extent, gastric disorders, thereby opening new avenues for diagnosis and comprehensive clinical management. The review of the documents shows that, despite the methodological robustness, statistical testing, classification approaches, and the breadth of entropy measures employed, significant challenges remain when integrating these techniques due to the intrinsic complexity and heterogeneity of bioelectrical signals in FD. Furthermore, knowledge gaps persist, particularly in digestive disorders such as FD, underscoring the need to deepen and diversify analytical methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.