SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2026
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleTreating obesity in children and adolescents is complex, given the dynamic nature of growth and development during this life stage. The role of pharmacological treatments in the management of pediatric obesity remains uncertain, particularly with respect to outcomes beyond weight reduction, including quality of life and long-term adverse events.
objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents. SEARCH
methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov on 3 July 2023 without language restrictions. In June 2025, we checked the status of ongoing studies and updated results accordingly. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacological interventions in children (0 to 9 years) and adolescents (10 to 19 years) with essential obesity. Eligible studies administered any medication, at any dose, as monotherapy or in combination, for at least three months and reported outcomes after a minimum follow-up of six months. OUTCOMES: Critical outcomes were change in body mass index (BMI), change in weight, any adverse events, discontinuation due to adverse events, and incidence or severity of obesity-related outcomes. Important outcomes were health-related quality of life, mental and physical well-being, and obesity-related disability. RISK OF BIAS: We used the RoB 2 tool to assess bias in the included RCTs. SYNTHESIS
methodsWe calculated mean differences (MDs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes, with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for critical outcomes and quality of life. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included 37 RCTs with a total of 4218 participants. Two were cross-over trials; 35 were parallel-group trials. We identified seven ongoing studies and six studies as awaiting classification. Of the included studies, 25 involved adolescents only. Eleven studies planned to include both children and adolescents, but only eight actually did. One study intended to include children but did not specify participants' age at inclusion. Trials randomized participants to pharmacological interventions or control alongside common baseline treatments (e.g. behavioral or lifestyle approaches, diet, and physical activity). Of the 37 included studies, 31 used placebo and six used no intervention (baseline treatment alone) as the comparator. The studies were conducted across 17 high-income, six middle-income, and three low-income countries. Length of follow-up ranged from six to 31 months, with a median of 11 months. SYNTHESIS OF
resultsPharmacological interventions versus placebo Compared to placebo, pharmacological interventions (glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] receptor agonists, metformin, orlistat, sibutramine, topiramate, phentermine plus topiramate) may reduce BMI (change from baseline) by 1.80 kg/m AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review includes clinical trials assessing the benefits and harms of pharmacological treatments - including GLP-1 agonists, metformin, orlistat, phentermine, sibutramine, and topiramate - for weight management in adolescents with obesity. Evidence suggests that pharmacological treatments may result in small reductions in BMI and weight, which could be clinically important, although effects vary by medication. Evidence on desirable and undesirable effects in children is scant. Uncertainties remain about the optimal duration of treatment, consequences of treatment discontinuation, and long-term benefits and harms, particularly considering the physiology of children and impact on growth. Studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate outcomes beyond BMI and weight change, including the potential effects of treatment discontinuation.
fundingThe Department of Nutrition and Food Safety at the WHO commissioned and provided financial support for this work. WHO acknowledges financial support from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD), the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), the Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Government of Germany (BMG), and the Government of Greece to the WHO Department of Nutrition and Food Safety. REGISTRATION: Our protocol is registered in PROSPERO: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023433123.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.