ReviewJournal of experimental botany2026
Elevated methionine in plants: the effect on development, stress responses, epigenetics, and nutritional biofortification.
Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sulfur signaling: from molecules to physiological responses.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methionine (Met) is an essential amino acid that limits the nutritional value of many crop plants, yet its steady-state level in plant tissues is remarkably low. At the same time, Met is a central metabolic hub supporting protein synthesis and, through S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), drives the production of hormones, vitamins, polyamines, and epigenetic marks. The primary objective of this review is to understand why and how plants maintain low steady-state Met levels, and what occurs when Met content is elevated, a question of growing importance for Met biofortification. We first summarize evidence that flux through the Met/SAM pathway is high while Met pools remain small, because Met is rapidly diverted to SAM, S-methylmethionine (SMM), and other metabolites. We then describe how increasing Met at the genetic level alters development, primary metabolism, and stress responses, enhancing amino acids and sugars in leaves and proteins and starch in seeds, but often causing growth defects and stress hypersensitivity. However, moderate exogenous Met can improve growth and stress tolerance. Finally, we highlight how changes in Met/SAM levels affect DNA and histone methylation, as well as transposable-element silencing. Together, these findings suggest that plants limit Met to control metabolic, redox, and epigenetic modification, constraining Met biofortification strategies and seed nutritional improvement efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.