ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2026
Computational Insights into the Activation Mechanism of CXCR4: Implications for the Design of Small Molecule Agonists.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are transmembrane proteins that mediate diverse signaling functions, making them important therapeutic targets. The chemokine receptor CXCR4, a GPCR, plays multifaceted roles in both normal physiological and pathological processes. Here, we constructed conformational free energy profiles of CXCR4 activation using Targeted Molecular Dynamics (TMD) and Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations combined with our refined Coarse-Grained (CG) model for membrane proteins. The simulations revealed that CXCR4 activation involves three distinct transition states. TS1, which exhibits the highest activation energy barrier, primarily involves conformational changes in intracellular loop 3 (ICL3) and the prerearrangement of transmembrane helices TM5 and TM6. Additionally, the stabilization of the specific active conformations of W94 and E288 within the CXCR4 active site was found to reduce the activation energy barriers of TS2 and TS3, respectively. Alanine scanning further revealed the dynamic roles of other residues whose putative crucial role in CXCR4 activation had previously been postulated, transitioning from stabilizing the inactive state to facilitating activation in later stages. Guided by these computational insights, we designed a small-molecule compound, HL82624, using a dual-moiety strategy combining the first two amino acids of SDF-1α (Lys and Pro) with the CXCR4 antagonist HF51116. Competitive binding and cell migration assays showed that HL82624 binds to CXCR4 and effectively triggers cell migration, confirming its activity as a CXCR4 agonist. Taken together, this study provides mechanistic insight into CXCR4 activation and a computational strategy for the rational design of small-molecule CXCR4 agonists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.