Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126916›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

A context-free model of savings in motor learning.

Mahdiyar Shahbazi, Olivier Codol, Jonathan A Michaels, Paul L Gribble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahdiyar ShahbaziDepartment of Psychology, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4883-4376
Olivier CodolMila-Québec Artificial Intelligence Institute, Montréal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0796-5457
Jonathan A Michaels *Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5179-3181
Paul L Gribble *Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1368-032X

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN/05458-2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning to adapt voluntary movements to an external perturbation, whether mechanical or visual, is faster during a second encounter than during the first. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, known as savings, remain unclear. Recent studies propose that the high dimensionality of neural control enables the retention of learning traces that may facilitate savings. To test this idea, we used MotorNet, a framework for training recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to control biomechanical models of the human upper limb. RNNs were trained to perform reaching movements with a velocity-dependent force field (FF) and without (NF) in the sequence NF1 (baseline), FF1 (adaptation), NF2 (washout), and FF2 (re-adaptation). RNNs showed behaviural signatures of savings in the absence of any explicit contextual input signalling the presence or absence of the FF. Savings was more robust in RNNs with larger numbers of units. We identified a component of RNN activity associated with savings-a shift in preparatory activity that persisted even after washout. Displacing this preparatory activity in the direction of the shift enhanced savings, whereas perturbations in the opposite direction reduced or eliminated savings. These findings suggest a potential neural basis for motor memory retention underlying savings that is reliant on the high dimensionality of neural circuits for control, and is independent of cognitive or strategic learning.

Indexed as

LearningModels, NeurologicalMotor SkillsRecurrent Neural NetworksBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansModels, AnatomicMovementReaction TimeUpper Extremitycomputational modelMotorNetneural networkneurosciencenone

Identifiers

PMID42126916
PMCPMC13171098

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.