Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42127089›Full record

ReviewPLOS digital health2026

Decoding (digital) histopathology: The building blocks for computational researchers.

Salma Dammak, Alessandro Caputo, Diana Montezuma, Vincenzo L'Imperio, Sara P Oliveira, European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP)

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Salma DammakEuropean Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Lisbon, Portugal.
Alessandro CaputoEuropean Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Lisbon, Portugal.
Diana MontezumaEuropean Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Lisbon, Portugal.
Vincenzo L'ImperioEuropean Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9284-2998
Sara P OliveiraEuropean Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP), Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6586-9079
European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational Pathology is a novel discipline at the intersection of pathology and computer science, driven by the recent advances in machine learning and image analysis. Nevertheless, combining the insights from both disciplines remains challenging, particularly due to differences in technical background and language between pathologists and engineers. It is acknowledged that literature translating fundamental pathology concepts for computer scientists remains limited, which further complicates the understanding of the field, especially for those entering the field. In this context, and aligned with the mission of the European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP) to promote education and interdisciplinary collaboration in digital and computational pathology, this work aims to provide a comprehensive yet accessible guide to pathology for computational scientists and other researchers. Herein, we present an overview of the pathology laboratory workflow, digital pathology and whole-slide imaging, diagnostic fundamentals of neoplastic and nonneoplastic diseases, and current applications of AI in pathology. This guide is designed as a practical reference and educational resource to support computer scientists new to the field and to promote more effective collaboration between medical and computational communities.

Identifiers

PMID42127089
PMCPMC13170827

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.