ReviewEpidemiology and health2026
The evolution of sampling in epidemiology: from classical probability models to AI-enhanced recruitment and active learning.
Review in Epidemiology and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sampling is a foundational element of epidemiological research because it determines the validity, efficiency, and generalizability of population-based inferences. Classical probability and non-probability sampling methods have long underpinned public health study design by providing robust frameworks for unbiased estimation and causal inference. However, the rapid expansion of digital health data, electronic health records, and large-scale online cohorts has exposed important limitations in these largely static sampling frameworks. This narrative review traces the evolution of sampling in epidemiology from traditional probability-based designs to contemporary artificial intelligence-enhanced recruitment strategies, with particular emphasis on active learning and adaptive sampling. By synthesizing classical statistical theory with emerging machine-learning approaches and recent methodological advances, this review argues that the future of epidemiological sampling lies in hybrid frameworks that preserve statistical rigor while leveraging algorithm-driven adaptability. Methodological opportunities, ethical risks, and implications for low-income and middle-income countries are critically examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.