Evidence mapPaperPMID 42128481Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026

Should weight loss be the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea? A pro-con debate.

Sanjay R Patel, Silke Ryan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanjay R PatelCenter for Sleep and Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA patelsr2@upmc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9142-5172
Silke RyanPulmonary and Sleep Disorders Unit, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0963-255X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder associated with substantial morbidity. Although obesity is an important pathogenetic factor in OSA, the incorporation of weight loss into routine OSA care is currently limited. The development of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists has revolutionised obesity management and raises questions about the role of weight loss in OSA care. A debate was held at the 8th Sleep and Breathing Conference in April 2025 on whether weight loss should be first-line treatment for patients with OSA. Arguments in favour include the large and growing proportion of OSA attributable to excess weight, the effectiveness of modern weight-loss therapies in producing significant weight loss and the extent to which weight loss produces effects on clinical outcomes beyond OSA, such as the positive impact on cardiovascular and metabolic disease incidence and control. Conversely, arguments against include the fact that not all patients with OSA have obesity, the limited impact of weight loss on OSA resolution and the considerable data gap with obesity strategies in OSA including the lack of direct comparisons with CPAP on patient-centred outcomes and the impact on long-term health benefits in OSA patients specifically. Clearly, while more research is needed and treatment decisions should be personalised, clinicians need to gain competency with the use of novel weight-loss treatments as an essential part of OSA care.

Indexed as

Anti-Obesity AgentsLungObesitySleepSleep Apnea, ObstructiveWeight LossHumansRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Obesity Agents

Identifiers

PMID42128481
PMCPMC13169064

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.