ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
Should weight loss be the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea? A pro-con debate.
Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder associated with substantial morbidity. Although obesity is an important pathogenetic factor in OSA, the incorporation of weight loss into routine OSA care is currently limited. The development of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists has revolutionised obesity management and raises questions about the role of weight loss in OSA care. A debate was held at the 8th Sleep and Breathing Conference in April 2025 on whether weight loss should be first-line treatment for patients with OSA. Arguments in favour include the large and growing proportion of OSA attributable to excess weight, the effectiveness of modern weight-loss therapies in producing significant weight loss and the extent to which weight loss produces effects on clinical outcomes beyond OSA, such as the positive impact on cardiovascular and metabolic disease incidence and control. Conversely, arguments against include the fact that not all patients with OSA have obesity, the limited impact of weight loss on OSA resolution and the considerable data gap with obesity strategies in OSA including the lack of direct comparisons with CPAP on patient-centred outcomes and the impact on long-term health benefits in OSA patients specifically. Clearly, while more research is needed and treatment decisions should be personalised, clinicians need to gain competency with the use of novel weight-loss treatments as an essential part of OSA care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.