ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Circadian instability following mass trauma predicts PTSD risk.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elevated rates of adverse PTSD symptom trajectories in a civilian mass-trauma cohort.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- The Nova Protocol: a comprehensive multimodal longitudinal study among civilian survivors of a mass trauma event.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- Detection of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder With Rest-Activity Data: Machine Learning Approach Using Wearable and Self-Report Data.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trauma exposure can lead to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in a subset of vulnerable individuals. Circadian rhythm disturbances have emerged as a candidate pathway of vulnerability, yet mean circadian levels often show limited discriminability. We tested whether circadian instability at trauma aftermath prospectively predicts long-term PTSD risk, and what behavioral and physiological indices are most predictive. For that, 211 survivors of the Supernova music festival mass-trauma event and 113 matched comparison participants were monitored in real-world settings for one-month, two-to-six months post-event, using wearable sensors that tracked their heart rate (HR), activity, and sleep-wake cycles. PTSD symptoms were assessed before and after the recording period, as well as at follow-up eight-to-eleven months post-event. Linear regression models compared circadian metrics between trauma survivors and comparison participants, and tested associations between circadian measures two-to-six months post-event and PTSD status and severity at follow-up. Results revealed that trauma survivors exhibited reduced circadian stability relative to comparison participants, characterized by greater sleep interday instability and higher variability in daily HR acrophase, as well as elevated rhythm-adjusted mean HR (MESOR). Further, circadian instability at two-to-six months post-event was particularly elevated among survivors with PTSD at follow-up and predicted their symptom severity. Finally, hierarchical models highlighted sleep instability at trauma aftermath as the most significant circadian predictor of long-term PTSD risk, above and beyond initial PTSD severity. Together, specific behavioral and physiological metrics of circadian instability at trauma aftermath prospectively index PTSD risk, highlighting circadian regulation as a target for vulnerability monitoring and early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.