Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129197›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Targeted degradation of USP7 in solid cancer cells reveals distinct effects of deubiquitinase degraders and inhibitors.

Nikolas Klink, Sebastian Urban, Johanna A Seier, Bikash Adhikari, Martin P Schwalm, Juliane Müller, Madeleine Dorsch, Philine Steinbach, Jennifer Jung, Markus Vogt and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Nikolas Klink *Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-4325-3528
Sebastian Urban *West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Johanna A Seier *Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Bikash AdhikariInstitute of Biochemistry, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9064-0356
Martin P SchwalmInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1252-1829
Juliane MüllerInstitute of Biochemistry, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Madeleine DorschWest German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Philine SteinbachDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jennifer JungWest German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4870-6059
Markus VogtInstitute of Biochemistry, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4525-2901
Farnusch KaschaniFaculty of Biology and Analytics Core Facility Essen (ACE), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6572-3232
Johannes KochImaging Center Campus Essen, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-3344-7303
Siska FührerDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-4334-221X
Markus KaiserFaculty of Biology and Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6540-8520
Nina SchulzeImaging Center Campus Essen, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-5503-6218
Stefan KnappInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5995-6494
Elmar WolfInstitute of Biochemistry, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5299-6335
Annette PaschenDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. annette.paschen@uk-essen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1651-1262
Barbara M GrünerWest German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. barbara.gruener@uk-essen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0974-4826
Malte GerschDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany. malte.gersch@tu-dortmund.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2767-9589

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 418179183 KFO 337; PA 2376/1-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 424228829 - SFB1430Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) GE 3110/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) WO 2108/2-1, TRR387, GRK 3085Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid) TACTICEC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101087045EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) EUbOPEN grant 875510Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Max Planck Society) CGCIII-352S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) co-op the ubiquitin system for targeted protein degradation, creating opportunities to interrogate cellular functions of proteins through "chemical knockdown". However, matched pairs of protein degraders and inhibitors, that possess high specificity and chemical complementarity, for individual components of the ubiquitin system have remained scarce. This includes reagents to modulate activity and abundance of deubiquitinases (DUBs). Here, using an integrated chemical biology approach, we explore cellular functions of the DUB USP7 as a case study by comparing inhibition and degradation in melanoma and pancreatic cancer cells. Through the synthesis of a degrader library, we identify and characterize potent USP7 PROTACs for each cancer type. Proteomic and cellular analyses reveal that selective USP7 degradation modulates both shared and distinct protein sets across both cancers without affecting cell growth. In contrast, prolonged inhibitor treatment induces USP7-independent proteomic and metabolic dysregulation, highlighting important caveats for the cellular use of hydroxypiperidine-based USP7 inhibitors. Collectively, our work provides a comprehensively characterized chemical toolbox to distinguish on-target phenotypes which will aid the understanding of USP7 in malignant diseases. More broadly, our data emphasize the importance of increased specificity via PROTAC-mediated degradation and the potential of this modality to elucidate cell-line specific functions of DUBs.

Indexed as

MelanomaPancreatic NeoplasmsProteolysisUbiquitin-Specific Peptidase 7Cell Line, TumorHumansProteolysis Targeting ChimeraProteomicsProteolysis Targeting ChimeraUbiquitin-Specific Peptidase 7USP7 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID42129197
PMCPMC13172357

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.