ArticleScientific reports2026
Associations between psychological factors and functional dyspepsia symptoms with consideration of gender differences.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction in which psychological factors may influence symptom presentation. This cross-sectional study examined the associations between stress resilience, somatization, subjective well-being (SWB), and FD symptoms, with a particular focus on gender differences. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) presenting with dyspeptic symptoms and referred for their first upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were recruited at the University Clinical Hospital of Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Psychological factors were assessed using validated questionnaires, and FD symptom characteristics included FD subtypes, intensity, frequency, and duration. Group differences were analysed using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests, whereas multinomial logistic regression and multivariate multiple regression were used to evaluate associations between psychological variables and FD outcomes. Lower resilience and SWB, along with a higher somatization, were significantly associated with membership to the mixed FD type. Higher somatization was associated with more severe symptoms, and higher age was associated with longer symptom duration. Higher SWB scores corresponded, although marginally, to less frequent symptom reporting. Several variables differed by sex/gender. These findings support the role of gut-brain interactions in FD and may inform the development of targeted psychological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.