ArticleCommunications biology2026
Estimating genotype-tissue specific gene expression using hybrid deep learning.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genotype-tissue expression profiles are critical for understanding how genetic variation influences gene regulation across tissues, yet they are often missing or incomplete, and experimental profiling is costly and time-consuming. Although computational approaches exist for multi-tissue imputation and sequence-based expression prediction, they do not explicitly use expression information from neighboring reference genes and their genomic context for collated multi-tissue imputation. To address this, we developed a novel hybrid deep learning model that integrates a convolutional neural network (CNN), a transformer encoder, and an XGBoost regressor to estimate these profiles with high accuracy. By combining promoter sequences, tissue correlations, intergene distances, and gene orientation, our model achieves ~30% higher accuracy than distance-based methods, generating expression profiles that closely align with experimental data. We demonstrate its utility by completing missing profiles in the GTEx dataset. Our model offers a practical and scalable alternative to experimental profiling and enables cost-effective estimation of genotype-tissue-specific expression profiles, particularly for lowly expressed RNA genes and less-characterized genomes, paving the way for advances in genomics research where experimental data are scarce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.