Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129798›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Using normalization process theory to evaluate the implementation of a hybrid psychosocial prevention intervention in mental health care - a qualitative interview study.

Jan Gehrmann, Johannes Stephan, Jana Dehner, Ananda Stullich, Matthias Richter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan GehrmannChair of Social Determinants of Health, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Jan.Gehrmann@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-016X
Johannes StephanChair of Social Determinants of Health, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6386-1454
Jana DehnerChair of Social Determinants of Health, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0243-001X
Ananda StullichChair of Social Determinants of Health, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2624-8517
Matthias RichterChair of Social Determinants of Health, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3898-3332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increase in mental health disorders underscores the importance of preventive interventions and strategies. The approach of hybrid interventions integrating analog and common therapeutic approaches with digital health applications offers promising solutions but faces challenges in routine implementation. This study examines the implementation of the new hybrid intervention 'RV Fit Mental Health' within the German health care system, using Normalization Process Theory (NPT) as the guiding theoretical framework.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted with nine experts involved in the development and implementation of the intervention, including professionals from the therapeutic and administrative domains of the implementation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using qualitative content analysis, following the NPT framework and the NPT coding manual.

resultsThe findings demonstrate that while the shift towards preventive care within the intervention required substantial organizational and normative adaptations, the intervention was largely perceived as a valuable and integrative addition in established care. Facilitating factors included stakeholder collaboration, a shared understanding of and goals for preventive care, and flexible, open organizational structures. Barriers and challenges were mainly linked to time and resource constraints, technical integration of the digital component, and the redefinition of professional roles. The implementation of the intervention reshaped therapeutic routines, fostered interdisciplinary collaboration, and was increasingly normalized within the specific conditions of a model project, both within clinical and administrative workflows and across organizational boundaries.

conclusionsThe implementation of the hybrid intervention RV Fit Mental Health was largely successful. The evaluation of the implementation of (hybrid) interventions benefits from a theory-driven approach. NPT provided valuable insights into how such interventions are embedded in existing systems and structures and how preventive and hybrid approaches can be sustainably integrated. The results offer both theoretical and practical implications for the design, implementation, and evaluation of similar interventions in diverse healthcare settings.

trial registrationDRKS-ID: DRKS00033080 (Date of registration: 07 December 2023).

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesDigital HealthGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchDigital healthHybrid interventionImplementationMedical appsMental healthNormalization process theoryPrevention

Identifiers

PMID42129798
PMCPMC13173747

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.