ArticleBMC health services research2026
Using normalization process theory to evaluate the implementation of a hybrid psychosocial prevention intervention in mental health care - a qualitative interview study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital focus groups in healthcare interventions: A reflexive methodological analysis of how socio-technical and relational factors co-produce qualitative data.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increase in mental health disorders underscores the importance of preventive interventions and strategies. The approach of hybrid interventions integrating analog and common therapeutic approaches with digital health applications offers promising solutions but faces challenges in routine implementation. This study examines the implementation of the new hybrid intervention 'RV Fit Mental Health' within the German health care system, using Normalization Process Theory (NPT) as the guiding theoretical framework.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted with nine experts involved in the development and implementation of the intervention, including professionals from the therapeutic and administrative domains of the implementation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using qualitative content analysis, following the NPT framework and the NPT coding manual.
resultsThe findings demonstrate that while the shift towards preventive care within the intervention required substantial organizational and normative adaptations, the intervention was largely perceived as a valuable and integrative addition in established care. Facilitating factors included stakeholder collaboration, a shared understanding of and goals for preventive care, and flexible, open organizational structures. Barriers and challenges were mainly linked to time and resource constraints, technical integration of the digital component, and the redefinition of professional roles. The implementation of the intervention reshaped therapeutic routines, fostered interdisciplinary collaboration, and was increasingly normalized within the specific conditions of a model project, both within clinical and administrative workflows and across organizational boundaries.
conclusionsThe implementation of the hybrid intervention RV Fit Mental Health was largely successful. The evaluation of the implementation of (hybrid) interventions benefits from a theory-driven approach. NPT provided valuable insights into how such interventions are embedded in existing systems and structures and how preventive and hybrid approaches can be sustainably integrated. The results offer both theoretical and practical implications for the design, implementation, and evaluation of similar interventions in diverse healthcare settings.
trial registrationDRKS-ID: DRKS00033080 (Date of registration: 07 December 2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.