ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Assessing the association between combined oral contraceptive use, selected biomarkers, and depressive episodes among premenopausal women: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCombined oral contraceptives (COCs) are widely used among premenopausal women because of their contraceptive efficacy and favourable safety profile. However, concerns remain regarding their potential association with depressive symptoms and major depressive disorder (MDD), possibly mediated through alterations in neurochemical, inflammatory, and neurotrophic biomarkers. Hence, this study aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on the link between COC and selected biomarkers associated with MDD risk and to assess whether the reported outcome is associated with the generational type of COC.
methodsThis systematic review protocol was prepared following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. An extensive search will be conducted on Embase and MEDLINE through the Ovid and EBSCOhost interface. The Cochrane Library will be searched to augment relevant sources of information. Two reviewers will independently screen for eligible studies using a pre-defined criterion. The risk of bias and quality of included studies will be assessed via Cochrane risk of bias tools. The certainty of evidence will be assessed via Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Assessment (GRADE) tool. DISCUSSION: The rate of depression among women of reproductive age remains alarming due to various factors related to childbearing, which may limit their economic contribution and full participation in societal development. As a result, some of these women may opt for the use of available contraceptive choices, such as COC, which are linked to the onset of MDD in high-risk individuals. More so, the change in hormonal milieu influences the secretion and physiologic role of histamine and other neurotransmitters, such as serotonin, among others, thereby contributing to an increased risk of MDD in premenopausal women. Thus, unravelling the role of COC in the secretions of these biomarkers and their contribution to the onset of MDD among premenopausal women is essential in filling the research gap that will provide insight and guidance when making informed decisions about the available contraceptive choices. The uniqueness of our review also extends to the focus on biomarker-based evidence of mood disorder risk in COC users, which may provide mechanistic insight and inform future risk-stratification research to assess the risk of MDD, both in and outside the clinical setting, among high-risk individuals. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021284745.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.