ReviewJournal of biological engineering2026
3D bioprinting of microfluidic systems for cardiac regenerative medicine: from biofabrication to organ-on-a-chip.
Review in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of mortality worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for advanced therapeutic strategies in cardiac regenerative medicine. Among emerging technologies, 3D bioprinting has revolutionized the fabrication of biomimetic tissues by enabling precise spatial control over cells and biomaterials. At the same time, microfluidic systems, also referred to as "organ-on-a-chip" platforms, have provided dynamic environments that closely mimic natural cardiac physiology. In this review, we first summarize the structure and function of the human heart to establish the biological context for cardiac tissue modeling. We then discuss the main 3D bioprinting techniques (droplet-based, extrusion-based, and laser-assisted bioprinting) and highlight their advantages, limitations, and suitability for the fabrication of microfluidic architectures. Key properties of ideal biomaterials for both 3D bioprinting and organ-on-a-chip systems are discussed, with an emphasis on materials commonly used in microfluidic systems. Finally, we provide an in-depth overview of microfluidic systems and explore how 3D bioprinting is being used to create integrated heart-on-a-chip platforms for disease modeling and regenerative therapy. The integration of these technologies holds promise for the development of next-generation platforms in personalized cardiovascular therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.