Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129889›Full record

ReviewJournal of biological engineering2026

3D bioprinting of microfluidic systems for cardiac regenerative medicine: from biofabrication to organ-on-a-chip.

Ahmad Darvishi, Hossein Rayat Pisheh, Seyed Ahmadreza Ahmadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmad DarvishiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran.
Hossein Rayat PishehDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. H_rayatpisheh@sums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1051-8466
Seyed Ahmadreza AhmadiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of mortality worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for advanced therapeutic strategies in cardiac regenerative medicine. Among emerging technologies, 3D bioprinting has revolutionized the fabrication of biomimetic tissues by enabling precise spatial control over cells and biomaterials. At the same time, microfluidic systems, also referred to as "organ-on-a-chip" platforms, have provided dynamic environments that closely mimic natural cardiac physiology. In this review, we first summarize the structure and function of the human heart to establish the biological context for cardiac tissue modeling. We then discuss the main 3D bioprinting techniques (droplet-based, extrusion-based, and laser-assisted bioprinting) and highlight their advantages, limitations, and suitability for the fabrication of microfluidic architectures. Key properties of ideal biomaterials for both 3D bioprinting and organ-on-a-chip systems are discussed, with an emphasis on materials commonly used in microfluidic systems. Finally, we provide an in-depth overview of microfluidic systems and explore how 3D bioprinting is being used to create integrated heart-on-a-chip platforms for disease modeling and regenerative therapy. The integration of these technologies holds promise for the development of next-generation platforms in personalized cardiovascular therapy.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingBiofabricationCardiac regenerationHeart-on-a-chipMicrofluidic systems

Identifiers

PMID42129889
PMCPMC13343960

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.