Evidence mapPaperPMID 42130815Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging2026

Association between loneliness and social isolation and health outcomes among cancer survivors and non-cancer controls.

Nancy E Avis, Sybil Crawford, Alicia Colvin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nancy E AvisDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Sybil CrawfordTan Chingfen Graduate School of Nursing, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Alicia ColvinDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The present analyses take advantage of an existing cohort of cancer survivors (cases) and women without a history of cancer (controls) to examine whether older cancer survivors experience greater loneliness or social isolation than women without a history of cancer and how loneliness and social isolation are related to health outcomes. Methods: Cross-sectional analyses were conducted from Visit 17 of The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a multiracial/ethnic cohort study initiated to study the biological and psychosocial changes occurring during the menopausal transition. We identified 276 women who had developed cancer over the 30 years of SWAN (eligible cases) and 1,123 women who never had cancer. Loneliness was measured using the UCLA 3-item loneliness scale. Social isolation was assessed with a modified version of the Social Network Index. Outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQL) as assessed by the SF-36 (MCS and PCS), depressive symptoms (CES-D), and anxiety. Covariates included sociodemographic, health-related, and psychosocial variables. Associations of case-control status, years since diagnosis in cases, loneliness, and social isolation with MCS and PCS were estimated using analysis of covariance, and with depressive symptoms and high anxiety using logistic regression. Effect modification of loneliness and social isolation by case-control status was assessed by adding relevant interaction terms to models. Results: Case-control status was not significantly related to loneliness or social isolation. Loneliness and social isolation were negatively related to PCS before, but not after covariate adjustment. Corresponding negative associations with MCS remained statistically significant after covariate adjustment. Loneliness and social isolation were positively associated with depressive symptoms. Loneliness, but not social isolation, was positively associated with high anxiety. With the exception of a significantly stronger unadjusted association of PCS with loneliness in controls than in cases, there was no statistically significant effect modification by case-control status before or after covariate adjustment. Conclusion: Neither loneliness nor social isolation was related to cancer survivorship status. Although both loneliness and social isolation were related to HRQL and mental health outcomes in a cohort of older women, these associations were similar for cancer survivors and those without a history of cancer.

Indexed as

anxietycancerdepressive symptomsHRQLlonelinesssocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID42130815
PMCPMC13160904

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.