Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2026
Efficacy and Safety of Oliceridine for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection Surgery for Gastrointestinal Malignant Tumors: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Opioid-related adverse events are common with sufentanil-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after laparoscopic gastrointestinal cancer surgery in older adults. Oliceridine, a G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist, may provide effective analgesia with fewer adverse events. Methods: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial (Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China), patients aged ≥60 years undergoing elective laparoscopic radical resection for gastrointestinal malignant tumors were allocated 1:1 to postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia containing oliceridine (0.4 mg/kg) or sufentanil (2 μg/kg), combined with ketorolac and tropisetron, for 48 hours. The primary endpoint was the cumulative area under the curve for resting 0-10 visual analogue scale pain scores over 0-48 hours. The non-inferiority margin was prespecified as 20% of the mean AUC in the sufentanil group (18.3 points), a threshold based on prior studies and deemed clinically acceptable. Results: Of 90 randomized patients, 88 received the study drug and were included in the analyses (44 per group); two patients were excluded as they never received the intervention. In the per‑protocol analysis, the cumulative resting pain area under the curve was 73.02±22.59 with sufentanil and 72.55±23.54 with oliceridine (between-group difference 0.48; 95% CI -9.30 to 10.26), meeting non-inferiority. A modified intention‑to‑treat analysis including all 88 treated patients yielded identical results, confirming robustness. Movement-evoked pain area under the curve was similar (difference 1.77; 95% CI -8.72 to 12.27). Respiratory depression occurred in 1/44 (2.27%) with oliceridine versus 8/44 (18.18%) with sufentanil, and hypotension in 5/44 (11.36%) versus 13/44 (29.55%). Conclusion: In elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal cancer surgery, oliceridine provided non-inferior analgesia to sufentanil while significantly lowering the incidence of respiratory depression and hypotension. These findings suggest that oliceridine may be a preferred opioid option for PCIA when respiratory and hemodynamic safety are critical concerns. Trial Registration: ChiCTR2400090780.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.