ReviewRSC applied interfaces2026
Antibacterial surface engineering: bioinspiration from leaves to medical devices.
Review in RSC applied interfaces, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nature-inspired biomaterial innovations to counter medical device-associated infections.Biomaterials science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare-acquired infections (HAIs) and the rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are critical global health challenges, necessitating innovative solutions to combat pathogenic bacteria. Traditional approaches, such as antibiotics and chemical disinfectants, are increasingly ineffective due to the rapid evolution of resistant strains and their associated side effects and environmental impacts. The development of antimicrobial physical surface design strategies presents a promising alternative for reducing microbial colonisation and transmission. This review provides a comprehensive examination of antimicrobial surface geometries and topographies, focusing on physical surface strategies that prevent bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. Inspired by naturally occurring structures such as insect wings and lotus leaves, these engineered surfaces employ nano- and micro-scale patterning to exert mechanical forces that disrupt microbial cells through membrane rupture or inhibit their attachment by limiting surface area for successful adhesion. We discuss key fabrication methods, mechanisms of action, material considerations, and clinical relevance, while also addressing challenges such as scalability, durability, and regulatory issues. By highlighting both the potential and limitations of physical surface modifications in healthcare environments, this review aims to inform future research and promote the integration of surface-based strategies in the design of next-generation medical devices and high-touch clinical surfaces.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.