ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026
Beyond mechanical revascularization: thrombo-inflammatory mechanisms and vascular bed-specific design of intracranial stents.
Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebrovascular and coronary artery diseases are among the leading causes of mortality. Stent systems are widely used in both cardiac and cerebrovascular interventions; however, in-stent restenosis and acute stent thrombosis associated with bare-metal stents can cause severe ischemic complications and markedly reduce therapeutic efficacy. Although drug-eluting stents significantly decrease the incidence of restenosis, they carry an increased risk of late and very late stent thrombosis. Currently, antiplatelet therapy remains the primary strategy to prevent stent-related thrombosis. Nevertheless, drugs eluted from stents can impair endothelial recovery. This delay in reendothelialization increases the risk of late thrombotic events. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying stent implantation-associated pathology is essential for the development of next-generation stent platforms and targeted pharmacological strategies. In this review, we systematically discuss the pathological mechanisms underlying stent-associated complications from four key perspectives: endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, the coagulation system, and inflammatory responses. By integrating current evidence from both coronary and intracranial vascular systems, this review aims to provide mechanistic insights to support the optimization of stent design and improve long-term clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.