ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Comparison of the effectiveness of ranibizumab monotherapy vs. combined panretinal photocoagulation on the regression of neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal treatment strategy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) remains an area of active investigation. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) on neovascularization regression in PDR. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 238 patients with PDR treated between January 2019 and December 2023. Patients were classified into a monotherapy group ( Results: At 24 months, the proportion of patients with residual neovascularization on the disc (NVD) was significantly lower in the combined PRP group (8.85%) than in the monotherapy group (23.20%, Conclusion: For PDR, ranibizumab combined with PRP was associated with greater NVD regression, reduced treatment burden, and a lower risk of sight-threatening complications compared with ranibizumab monotherapy, while visual and anatomical outcomes were comparable between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.